19-11-2016, 01:07 AM
(18-11-2016, 12:29 PM)Kujaschi link Wrote:If I understood correctly, soundwise FM8 should render original DX presets the same as FM7.Hello Sounddigger,
[align=center]yah you´re right in some things....
But do you know, if the "DX-engine" is the same as in FM7?
I don´t own FM8 - I´m using FM7 for years, cos I´ve never updated.
The FM7 always fits my needs - for my own DX-sounds and the
good factorypatches of the FM7 itself....
Quote:So, if there are differences between a TX802/816 and a DX7, thereHey Kujashi, you know what? We got fooled by Dexed's updates! : i bi bled
must be differences in the software too.
I don´t know....
For me, the "Atmo5" sounds very similar in FM7 as in the Dexed....
in Dexed to 80% - this "Yelling" is too quiet....
I have a very old song, I´ve used that sound and can compare to this.
But ok, we wont be too fussy...
For the "SynthX" - you may be right....
This patch sounds different in the DX7 as in the FM7 and far away
from that in Dexed....
Here´s a little example:
SynthX - Dexed:
[mp3=200,20,0,center]http://2lazy.music-society.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SynthX_Dexed.mp3[/mp3]
SynthX - FM7:
[mp3=200,20,0,center]http://2lazy.music-society.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SynthX_FM7.mp3[/mp3]
I´ve tried to fiddle in Dexed, to get the same result, but had to surrender....
Equal if "velocity", "Feedback" and some other parameters, i can´t get the
result like in FM7 or just the DX7....
While double checking your audio examples in various ways, I found out that there's a big difference in the way Dexed v 0.8.0 "Mark I" mode sounds compared to v 0.9.2b1 "Mark I" mode.
Since I created a handy library for v 0.8.0 that I have not yet had the time to transport to the update's formats, this is the version I was checking sounds with, most of the time.
The SynthX preset played with v 0.8.0 Mark I sounds much brighter than with v 0.9.2b1 Mark I !!
And SynthX played with v 0.9.2b1 Mark I sounds much more like my TX802 than when played with v 0.8.0, albeit a little less bright (not great). So the developer actually did a fairly good job. It's just a bit confusing...
Additionally, it sounds to me that you ended up using v 0.9.x in "Modern" mode, not "Mark I". So that makes it even more off... duh. :o
This also explains the different findings with the Atmo5 preset. v 0.9.x Mark I sounds spot on like my TX802.
Quote:"SynthX" in the DX7 sounds more silky, ...I don't exactly know what was modeled with v 0.8.0 Mark I, but SynthX played with that version actually has a bit of the "silky" element you're describing.
Quote:... more like....mmmh Do you rememberLooks to me you're talking about the following version, with that sound at 1:47:
that soundtrack from the movie "Das Boot", by Klaus Doldinger?
At the end of the "melody" there is that huge, majestic synthsound....
"SynthX" sounds similar, but a little more brighter - in the DX7...
and without this "Feedback" sizzle noise....but with more digital clearness.
But ok, we wont be holier than the pope....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LSMesXvjq8
SynthX played with v 0.8.0 Mark I sounds quite close to that.
For a possible alternative that sounds close to it in v 0.9.x, check the attached file. Find the preset called "Powerclav". It sounds very close to my TX802 (but admittedly not 100%), and a bit better than the FM8 rendition. It's not as silky as SynthX played with v 0.8.0 Mark I, but you might be able to tweak it into what you want.
Quote:Cos of this thread and re-working with my collection, I´m thinkingSeems like a good idea. I suspect a DX7 in good condition might become a valuable collectors item one day, seeing how it was the first popular FM synth. So it should be a sound investment (notice the pun!
to buy a DX7 again....
The DX seems to be cheap on Ebay these times and why not....

Saw an interesting offer on eBay a few hours ago, at 400 €. It's gone now... So that tells you something.
Quote:BTW it has a very good keyboard with nice aftertouch/dynamic ...Yup, some people really like it. Personally, I prefer a weighted keyboard for most of what I play. But there's a place for everything.
Quote:... and it seems, i can patch these kind of sounds, more on the originalI wasn't able to find a video with some comparisons between the DX7 and other versions, like DX7II, TX802 or TX816. Would've been interesting to clarify a few things if there were some.
as in my FM7 or Dexed - thats funny, crazy....
It´s 25 years ago and so much happened....
i´m curious which kind of sounds, I will explore out of the DX7 nowadays....
Going through a few videos of DX/TX demos, personally I'd say the TX802 often sounds better than DX7. And I know that the TX816 sounds fatter than TX802 (not always the best option, though - but great for bass and such).
DX7II is 2 x 16 voice DX7. TX802 is 8 x 2 voice DX7. TX816 is 8 x 16 voice DX7, and slightly fatter (better components?).
A comment at http://www.vintagesynth.com/yamaha/tx802.php claims there are differences in the output (not in the oscillators):
Quote:"The reson for the differet sound betwen the TX-802 and the TX-7/DX7 are that the first generations (TX7/DX7) had 10 bit output. The DX7 II and the TX802 have 12 or 16 bit (cant remember) outputs"
Service manuals clearly show mk1 family is 14-bit (12-bit DAC + 2 of analogue companding) vs mkII family with 15-bit DAC. People throw around DAC numbers, most wrong. So are a lot of claims about sound quality.
Here are some interesting vids showcasing the sounds of these:
Sort of a comparison between DX7, DX7II, but not the same preset!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJBXyZqgj58
DX7 factory presets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3rrjQtQ...E1u-s-Oxbp
Some DX7II sounds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9KReAQy...p&index=12
Some TX802 sounds (very much like Dexed Mark I)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Bmsp6tvwQ
Nice demo with only TX802
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgiedgOY_u0
And a nice one with TX816 (no FX)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww5IWNIIIiI
Viel spass
